Two Binghatti studio towers, in the same district, selling to the same buyer. The register puts 35% between them per square foot, and offers no reason why.
Skyflame 1 is the stronger position on the published data: 26% cheaper per square foot, with an open escrow account confirmed on the register. Binghatti Vintage does not appear in the register data we hold at all, so its escrow status is unknown rather than absent — a gap in our data, not a finding about the project. Vintage's higher rate needs a specific justification from the developer, and you should ask for it in writing along with the escrow account number.
| Field | Binghatti Vintage Binghatti Developments | Binghatti Skyflame 1 Binghatti Developments |
|---|---|---|
| What buyers actually paid Recorded Dubai Land Department sales, register read 2026-08-31. | ||
| Median price paid The middle price of every recorded sale this year. | AED 698,999 | AED 570,000 |
| Price per sqft The only figure that compares fairly across different unit sizes. | AED 1,852 | AED 1,371 |
| Recorded sales How many purchases the register holds. | 614 | 545 |
| Most sold unit What the per-foot rate above is actually pricing. | Studio | Studio |
| Asking price and payment | ||
| Starting price Advertised entry price, not a recorded sale. | AED 698,999 | AED 570,000 |
| Payment plan | ||
| Delivery | ||
| Handover | Confirm contractually — not in the DLD 2026 registration year | Confirm contractually — not in the DLD 2026 registration year |
| Escrow account The legal gate before units may lawfully be sold. Checked across every registration year from 2013. | Not found in the register we hold | Open registered 2026 |
| Units in scheme From the project register. More units means more competition at handover. | Not published | 1,407 |
| Location | ||
| Area | Majan, Dubailand, Dubai | Majan, Dubailand, Dubai |
| View Binghatti Vintage | View Binghatti Skyflame 1 | |
Binghatti Vintage transacts at a median AED 1,852 per square foot across 614 recorded purchases. Binghatti Skyflame 1 transacts at AED 1,371 across 545. Both are in Majan, both are majority-studio — 529 of Vintage's sales and 424 of Skyflame's — and both carry the same developer name. That is a 35% premium for what is, on the register, the same product from the same builder in the same district.
Per square foot is the right comparison here precisely because the headline prices look closer than the rate does. Vintage's median purchase is AED 698,999 and Skyflame's is AED 570,000, a 23% gap. The per-foot gap is wider because Vintage's units are smaller. A buyer comparing only the ticket price sees a 23% difference; a buyer comparing what they get for the money sees 35%.
Neither figure is a small sample. 614 and 545 recorded purchases are among the highest counts in Majan, so both medians are reliable and the gap between them is real rather than an artefact of a few unusual sales.
AED 1,852 against AED 1,371 per square foot. Same developer, same district, same unit type.
Skyflame 1 appears on the Land Department register with an open escrow account and 1,407 units. Binghatti Vintage does not appear in the register data we hold, which now covers registrations from 2013 onward.
That distinction matters and it is easy to get wrong. An absent record is not evidence of an absent account. Projects fall out of our coverage for ordinary reasons — a name recorded differently on the register than the one the developer markets under is the most common. Treating that as a mark against the project would be unfair, and we are not doing it here.
What it does mean is that we cannot confirm Vintage's escrow position for you, and you should confirm it yourself. Escrow is the legal gate before units may lawfully be sold and the mechanism that ring-fences your payments. Ask the Land Department for the account number for the specific project and tower you are buying, on the day you transfer money rather than the day you decide. That advice applies to Skyflame 1 too: a confirmed open account on the register still does not tell you which number your money should go to.
Skyflame 1: escrow open, 1,407 units registered. Vintage: no record in our register data.
A 35% per-foot premium inside one district from one developer is not automatically wrong, but it does need a reason, and the register cannot tell you what it is. The candidates are unit size, floor level, view, specification, and handover timing. Two of those you can check yourself by comparing the actual floor plans and the price list rather than the medians.
Neither project carries a filed handover date in the 2026 registration year, so both entries read 'confirm contractually'. That is the single most important thing to pin down in the sale agreement for either building, and it is worth more than any figure on this page. A contractual completion date with a penalty clause is the only version of a handover date that means anything.
If the developer cannot articulate what the extra 35% buys, the register's answer is that it buys nothing measurable.
Skyflame 1, clearly. It transacts at a median AED 1,371 per square foot against Vintage's AED 1,852 — about 26% less for the same space. On headline price the gap is narrower, AED 570,000 against AED 698,999, because Vintage's units are smaller. Both figures come from the Land Department register read 24 August 2026.
Skyflame 1 does, with 1,407 units on the register. Binghatti Vintage does not appear in the register data we hold at all, so its status is unknown rather than absent — that is a gap in our data, not a finding about the project. Confirm the account number with the Land Department for whichever you buy, on the day you transfer funds.
The register does not say. Both are Binghatti studio-led towers in Majan with large, reliable sale counts, so the gap is real rather than a sampling quirk. The usual explanations are unit size, floor, view, specification or handover timing — ask the developer to name which, and compare the actual floor plans rather than the medians.
Neither carries a filed handover date in the Land Department's 2026 registration year, so both read 'confirm contractually'. Get a contractual completion date with a penalty clause written into the sale agreement for either building. That is the only handover date that carries weight.
Actual recorded sales. Every price on this page is the median of what buyers genuinely paid according to the Dubai Land Department's open transaction register, read 24 August 2026 — not developer asking prices. How we read the DLD register explains the method and its limits.
Transaction figures come from the Dubai Land Department’s open register for 2026, read 2026-08-31, recomputed rather than taken from marketing material. Prices are those paid, not asked. Figures quoted in the written sections are fixed at the date of writing. How we read the register.